Last night I got an instance of something I haven’t seen nearly enough of during my time writing the Aftermath series: a truly critical review. Whereas some people might bristle at this kind of review, I reveled in it. Criticism is a very powerful tool that you can either use to hone your skills or let drag you down. I’m choosing the former option.
The reviewer made some very good and valid points, and it became clear to me there were some areas where I could have better conveyed the scenarios I was going for. Some of you might have seen the review and now have questions of your own. I just wanted to offer a response to it because I think it raises some very important points, but I think some things were missed and that’s probably my fault as the author.
The first point the reviewer made, and certainly the most emphasized, was that Joel would never, ever do anything to put Ellie in danger. Telling the bandits how to get into Jackson would contradict this fact, and that is where I wish I had written it differently. I’ll come back to this later.
Tied into this point, the reviewer had qualms with how quickly Joel and Lakyn’s relationship had seemed to progress. I’m going to come out and say what you’re all probably suspecting: I brought her character into the story with the full intention of having Joel care for her and having him eventually lose her. This was the plan from the get-go. I didn’t want to dwell too heavily on their relationship, as writing that kind of stuff isn’t really my forte, so I implemented some jumps forward in time (two of them if I’m not mistaken) in order to have their relationship progress. So yes, as it read, it may have seemed to happen overnight, but in real-time, it had taken months for them to get to a point where each of them felt like they were ready for something more. I don’t think I communicated this well because it may read that Joel just kind of dove in headfirst. I had the intention of making both of them seem hesitant about it.
But let’s back up: how was this relationship even possible given Joel’s disposition? He’s cold, ruthless, and shut-off emotionally, traits which I think he is putting on as a mask or survival tool to cover up how emotionally damaged he is. In the beginning of the game, we’re given very little insight into his relationship with Tess, but we can garner a few things from what we see. It’s left ambiguous as to whether or not they were romantically involved, but there are some hints that would indicate they were, at least to some degree. These hints come out the most evidently when Tess is saying goodbye. Her line about “there’s enough here that you have to feel some sort of obligation to me” is one indicator. Joel’s response is another. After he sees the bite, it’s evident in his face and his actions that she means a lot to him, more than he had let on up to that point, and initially he’s rather shocked about the whole ordeal. It’s only after her incessant orders to leave her that he finally snaps back into the gruff persona and orders Ellie to “get a move on.” Her death clearly affects him for some time, so I think it’s fair to say that Joel is capable, even after losing his daughter, to care about someone in that way even if he won’t admit it to himself.
Once he starts to grow closer to Ellie, we see his hardened shell start to erode, and by spring time, he’s borderline chipper. Ellie had gotten him to open up emotionally in a way he hadn’t in years. Now let’s fast forward to their settling in Jackson. Up until this point, his prime directive has been simple: keep Ellie safe, no matter what. In the grand scheme of things, Jackson is a safe place. It’s arguably safer than the QZ in Boston where Joel and Tess lived. On the ride back from the incident at the dam in Part II, Lakyn asks Joel if he’s capable of being close to someone, as in romantically. Up until this point in the story, Joel had never given it any thought at all (at least in my mind) and he says as much in his response to her. He says he hasn’t given it much thought and has more pressing matters at hand (i.e. keeping Ellie safe.) To me, it’s reasonable that Lakyn’s question got some wheels turning in his head. Maybe it is possible to have that kind of relationship again, now that he and Ellie are safe (so long as they stay within the town) and life is returning to some semblance of normalcy.
It is at this point that I have to bring up an exceptional take on the ending found in this video. The guy discussing the ending brings up the point about Joel’s mental state. He conjectures that at the end of the game, in Joel’s mind, he has reverted to a state where he never lost his daughter. He and Ellie can go live and be happy in Jackson as a family, and I think it stands to reason that it’s at least feasible Joel could seek to add to that family given the right woman came along. It could even be argued that he’s doing this to provide a mother figure for Ellie, though that’s not the argument I’m making. After all, we have seen back in Boston that Joel isn’t completely opposed to developing some degree of intimacy with a woman, even if he denies it to himself. Does the concept of forming a new happy family seem a little bit delusional? Absolutely. That’s the point.
So that’s my explanation to how Joel could find himself growing close to someone in a romantic sense: it’s all about the environment and circumstances. He decided the conditions were right to try to connect with someone in that way again.
This brings us to the cabin and the bandits breaking in and beating both Joel and Lakyn. Another point the reviewer brought up is that Joel was a hunter. He knew how hunters and bandits operated, and he would have known that the bandits were never going to let Lakyn live. They only needed one of them. Chief even points this out to Joel in chapter 20. The thing is, Joel did know. Deep down, somewhere inside, he knew. Thus, the visions of the spectres chanting You can’t save her. That was his subconscious telling Joel that Lakyn was going to die and there was nothing he could do about it.
He was scrambling for a solution in which no one died in a situation where no such solution existed. He ultimately chose the option that he hoped (foolishly, mind you) would delay the death of someone he cared about, giving him time to try to turn the tables. I say it was a foolish hope because, as I said in the previous paragraph, he knew that wasn’t going to happen. Perhaps it was the savage beating he had received that led to him not thinking clearly, but he clutched on to the hope that there was a way out of this where both Lakyn and Ellie lived. That hope was extremely short lived and is extinguished when Paulson shoots Lakyn in the head.
So now we come to my instance of malfeasance: Joel telling the bandits how to get into Jackson. What I should have had him do is lie to them, giving them a false way into town. He would have to assume they’d bring him along until they were able to get into town and then kill him, so lying to them would have served him well: they might let Lakyn live, and he’d have more time to try to stop them before they could get into town and hurt Ellie.
It’s no accident, then, that this figurative “breach of trust” where Joel goes against his prime directive results in horrific consequences, and it’s that fact that leads to the end of Part II. He realizes what happens if he strays from that path. People he cares for are slaughtered, and once Lakyn is gone, Ellie is all he has left. Yeah, I’m sure Tommy, and to a much lesser degree Maria, fall into that camp too, but they can take care of themselves. Sure, Ellie can too, but Joel still feels the paternal instinct to protect her.
Some people might gather that his shock in the aftermath of Lakyn’s death is because he cared so much for her, and there is a degree of that, but it’s more of a period of realization to him. He gets it into his head that “everyone I love and come close to ends up dead.” It sounds really melodramatic, but can you blame him? How many people dear to him has he lost?
I’m sure other people will be outraged at the concept of Joel seemingly abandoning Ellie at the end, but you have to look through the lens of his motivation. He’s back to assuming the prime directive: keep Ellie safe, no matter what. To him, given his realization, that means he now has to take himself out of the equation. He honestly believes in his mind that if he stays close to Ellie, she’s going to end up dead because of him. Is it a reasonable belief? From the outside looking in, no. But you have to understand that he’s just going off of the data he has. To this point, he’s lost everyone he loves: his wife (thought separation or death, we don’t know but I’d lean toward the former,) his daughter, his partner (with at least some degree of romantic involvement,) and now a woman he thought he could make a part of their family. I guess I can’t exactly blame him for extrapolating out and seeing it likely that Ellie will die on account of him.
He’s not about to let that happen, and he’s decided that he has to eliminate himself from the equation FOR THE SAKE OF HER SAFETY. Is this a bit nuts? YES. I can’t stress this enough. Joel is becoming mentally unstable. Twenty years of surviving in that hell hole and losing loved ones would do that to anyone. As it says in that video, we have examples of it throughout the game (Bill being the most prominent in my mind. Bill has developed some level of schizophrenia.) I have given hints of the concept of Joel’s mental instability throughout the Aftermath series: his haunted dreams and his waking visions of revenant Marlene, an embodiment of the dread he comes to realize at the end of Part II. He can’t save Elile, and in his delusions he decides the best course of action is to kill himself. The vision of Marlene shows up as the embodiment of dread and urges him to follow through, but something within Joel refuses to let that happen, and so he decides on the only other alternative: run. Leave her in the better stewardship of his brother and sister-in-law and separate entirely. He wholeheartedly believes this is the only way to keep her safe. To him, it is an act of love.
I hope this has shed some amount of light on my choices in the ending of Part II. I still think the reviewer has some good points, but some of them I disagreed with and have answered them above. Feel free to discuss in the comments, I’d like to hear other opinions on the matter.
Jeff